2025 Reshoring Survey: A Winning Formula for Successful Reshoring
November 4, 2025Comments
The 2025 USA Reshoring Survey, a collaboration between the Reshoring Initiative and Regions Recruiting, accumulated results from 500 U.S. manufacturers, including original equipment manufacturers (OEMs, 55% of respondents) and contract manufacturers (CMs, 45% of respondents.
The 2025 USA Reshoring Survey, a collaboration between the Reshoring Initiative and Regions Recruiting, accumulated results from 500 U.S. manufacturers, including original equipment manufacturers (OEMs, 55% of respondents) and contract manufacturers (CMs, 45% of respondents and defined as manufacturers of parts, components or tooling for use in an OEM end product). The survey offers insights into the opportunities and challenges to reshoring manufacturing, and reveals the foundational elements needed for U.S. reshoring: lower costs; a larger, more highly skilled workforce; use of total cost of ownership (TCO) when comparing domestic to offshore sourcing; and preparation for geopolitical risk. These are the core components needed for successful American reindustrialization.
The survey reached two actionable conclusions. First, a sufficient quantity and quality of U.S. workforce would bring back more manufacturing than any of the other surveyed options, including tariffs, a lower U.S. dollar, lower tax rates and fewer regulations. If we boost global competitiveness but don’t have factory workers, it’s futile.
Second, successful reshoring requires an established ecosystem of suppliers and intermediaries, such as the CMs surveyed, encompassing all steps from raw materials to finished product.
Barriers to U.S. Reindustrialization
- Tariff uncertainty.
Although
tariffs are encouraging some companies to site more manufacturing in the United
States, tariff uncertainty is discouraging reshoring. Without a stable,
long-term policy framework, companies are hesitant to make irreversible
commitments to increase U.S. manufacturing. If tariffs are to be used, we would rather see a 25 to 50% tariff on China and a
more modest 10 to 15% tariff on the rest of the world, firmly instituted on a
long-term basis, e.g. 10 yr, so that companies feel confident making
investments.
- Skilled labor shortage. The
survey confirms
that the skilled labor shortage is a significant barrier to foreign direct
investment (FDI) and reshoring efforts.
Some U.S. factory-startup and expansion projects have experienced delays
because of difficulties in finding skilled workers.
- Manufacturing costs. Manufacturing costs in the United States run about 50% higher than in China, and about 10 or 20% higher than in almost all other developed countries in the world. This makes the United States extremely uncompetitive, a problem that, if not addressed, will lead companies to continue sourcing and siting abroad.
With all of that said, let’s explore the key factors driving U.S. competitiveness, profitability and sustainability in contract manufacturing. First,
the survey finds that 59% of CMs either have already reshored for
their customers, are actively reshoring or are quoting reshoring (Fig. 1). When asked about quoting against imports, CMs say they are competing with imports on about 31% of quotes, with only 7% facing no offshore competition and 3% competing with imports on every quote. Too, 91% indicate that the primary reason they lost orders to imports was price (Fig. 2), and 68% of CMs say that f
or orders they lost to imports, the import FOB price was 20 to 50+% lower than their own. As a weighted average, prices of winning imports were about 24% lower than CM prices.





We encourage CMs to use TCO as a sales tool. OEMs making
sourcing decisions based on FOB price, landed cost or other incomplete
calculations typically will understate their offshoring costs by 20 to 30%.
The typical scenario
for CMs reshoring is an OEM customer with U.S. assembly operations shifting
sourcing of components, parts or tooling from offshore to a domestic supplier
(Fig. 4). Some 66% of respondents say that their reshoring is from customers
that had been assembling the end product in the United States and are moving
component sourcing onshore. The other 34% say that their OEM customers reshored
both assembly and sourcing. As more assembly comes back, CMs will experience another
surge of work.
We encourage companies to implement the top
priorities for reindustrialization revealed by the survey: Build a strong
talent pipeline, use TCO, and prepare for geopolitical risk.