Share content on LinkedIn Share content on YouTube

2025 Reshoring Survey: A Winning Formula for Successful Reshoring

November 4, 2025
0
Comments

The 2025 USA Reshoring Survey, a collaboration between the Reshoring Initiative and Regions Recruiting, accumulated results from 500 U.S. manufacturers, including original equipment manufacturers (OEMs, 55% of respondents) and contract manufacturers (CMs, 45% of respondents.

The 2025 USA Reshoring Survey, a collaboration between the Reshoring Initiative and Regions Recruiting, accumulated results from 500 U.S. manufacturers, including original equipment manufacturers (OEMs, 55% of respondents) and contract manufacturers (CMs, 45% of respondents and defined as manufacturers of parts, components or tooling for use in an OEM end product). The survey offers insights into the opportunities and challenges to reshoring manufacturing, and reveals the foundational elements needed for U.S. reshoring: lower costs; a larger, more highly skilled workforce; use of total cost of ownership (TCO) when comparing domestic to offshore sourcing; and preparation for geopolitical risk. These are the core components needed for successful American reindustrialization.

The survey reached two actionable conclusions. First, a sufficient quantity and quality of U.S. workforce would bring back more manufacturing than any of the other surveyed options, including tariffs, a lower U.S. dollar, lower tax rates and fewer regulations. If we boost global competitiveness but don’t have factory workers, it’s futile.

Second, successful reshoring requires an established ecosystem of suppliers and intermediaries, such as the CMs surveyed, encompassing all steps from raw materials to finished product.

Barriers to U.S. Reindustrialization

  • Tariff uncertaintyAlthough tariffs are encouraging some companies to site more manufacturing in the United States, tariff uncertainty is discouraging reshoring. Without a stable, long-term policy framework, companies are hesitant to make irreversible commitments to increase U.S. manufacturing. If tariffs are to be used, we would rather see a 25 to 50% tariff on China and a more modest 10 to 15% tariff on the rest of the world, firmly instituted on a long-term basis, e.g. 10 yr, so that companies feel confident making investments.

  • Skilled labor shortage. The survey confirms that the skilled labor shortage is a significant barrier to foreign direct investment (FDI) and reshoring efforts.  Some U.S. factory-startup and expansion projects have experienced delays because of difficulties in finding skilled workers.

  • Manufacturing costs. Manufacturing costs in the United States run about 50% higher than in China, and about 10 or 20% higher than in almost all other developed countries in the world. This makes the United States extremely uncompetitive, a problem that, if not addressed, will lead companies to continue sourcing and siting abroad.

reshoring-activity-by-contract-manufacturersWith all of that said, let’s explore the key factors driving U.S. competitiveness, profitability and sustainability in contract manufacturing. First, the survey finds that 59% of CMs either have already reshored for their customers, are actively reshoring or are quoting reshoring (Fig. 1). When asked about quoting against imports, CMs say they are competing with imports on about 31% of quotes, with only 7% facing no offshore competition and 3% competing with imports on every quote. Too, 91% indicate that the primary reason they lost orders to imports was price (Fig. 2), and 68% of CMs say that freasons-why-manufacturers-lose-orders-to-importsor orders they lost to imports, the import FOB price was 20 to 50+% lower than their own. As a weighted average, prices of winning imports were about 24% lower than CM prices.

Winning By Use of TCO as a Sales Tool

When comparing offshore vs. domestic sourcing, the survey finds that, unfortunately, most OEMs are doing the math incorrectly. CMs say that the basis most of their customers use when comparing offshore vs. domestic options is nearly evenly split between FOB/ExWorks/plant-level manufacturing cost (26%), landed cost (28%), and TCO (29%, Fig. 3).

how-manufacturers-compare-costs-for offshore-and-domestic-optionsWe encourage CMs to use TCO as a sales tool. OEMs making sourcing decisions based on FOB price, landed cost or other incomplete calculations typically will understate their offshoring costs by 20 to 30%.

The Reshoring Initiative’s Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Estimator is a free online tool that helps companies account for all relevant factors—overhead, balance sheet, risks, corporate strategy and other external and internal business considerations—to determine true TCO. CMs can use TCO to make a case with customers when competing with offshore competitors. 

Case in point: Morey Corp., an Ill.-based electronics CM. Its managers report that TCO was the key to winning a $60 million order when competing against a lower-price Chinese competitor.

Overall, a weighted average shows that CMs estimate that if they could recover all of the work they’ve lost to imports since the year 2000, their sales would be 26% higher today.

Why Did They Reshore?

reshoring-trends-components-and-assemblyThe typical scenario for CMs reshoring is an OEM customer with U.S. assembly operations shifting sourcing of components, parts or tooling from offshore to a domestic supplier (Fig. 4). Some 66% of respondents say that their reshoring is from customers that had been assembling the end product in the United States and are moving component sourcing onshore. The other 34% say that their OEM customers reshored both assembly and sourcing. As more assembly comes back, CMs will experience another surge of work.

Competitiveness Rests on Shorter Lead Times

Forty percent of OEMs say that they are willing to pay 10 to 20% more to quicken delivery by 5 weeks. This premium for shorter lead times points to a great opportunity for CMs. Typical delivery time by surface freight from inland China/Asia to the Midwest United States is about 6 weeks (Fig. 5).

shorter-lead-times-helps-with-reshoringWe encourage companies to implement the top priorities for reindustrialization revealed by the survey: Build a strong talent pipeline, use TCO, and prepare for geopolitical risk.

Have you reshored a metal component or product? Apply here for the National Metalworking Reshoring Award, which will be presented at IMTS 2026. MF

Industry-Related Terms: Case, Core, Run, Surface, Assembly
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms

 

See also: Reshoring Initiative

Technologies: Management

Comments

Must be logged in to post a comment.
There are no comments posted.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Start receiving newsletters.