Once we know the alloy and temper, we can refer to several standards (including EN 485-2) to obtain an alloy’s strength value. Fig. 1, for example, provides the stress-strain curve for two aluminum grades (AA 1100-O, one of the softest and most ductile grades, and AA 5754-H111), and for a draw-quality steel for comparison.
Is It Easier or Harder to Form Aluminum, Compared to Steel?
The answer to this question depends on the definition of “easy.” When working with soft tempers of 5xxx or 6xxx aluminum grades, yield and tensile strength are similar to or perhaps less than that of mild steels—it will take less load to bend the aluminum. However, the aluminum sheet will exhibit much more springback than a steel sheet at a similar strength level, as aluminum has one-third the elastic modulus. Looking at the curves in Fig. 1, it is clear that press-forming aluminum requires less force and energy compared to steel (with the specific grades shown in the figure).
“Easy to form” might also refer to forming crack-free parts. Aluminum has three major drawbacks when compared to steel: aluminum grades typically have less total elongation; they have negative strain-rate sensitivity (m-value); and they have very low r-values.
It is assumed—and mostly true—that an alloy with a higher total elongation also has more formability. Thus, one easily can check the graphs in Fig. 2 and say that aluminum is less formable than steel. Now imagine a steel grade with a total elongation similar to that of aluminum. The next property to consider: m-value. When local necking starts, strain rate in the necked area becomes much higher than in its surrounding non-necking area. With a negative strain-rate sensitivity, the necked area would be softer than the surrounding area. As both the strength and cross-sectional area get smaller, we should see fracture very soon after necking initiation. Table 4 illustrates how close together the values are for uniform and total elongation of aluminum alloys.
Another formability measure is plastic anisotropy (resistance to thinning), or r-value, often referred to as the Lankford coefficient. Aluminum alloys may have r values as low as 0.3, depending on the rolling direction, alloy and temper. The grades investigated here have r-values less than 1, indicating that they will thin more quickly than their width reduction. A draw-quality steel, on the other hand, has an r value of 2.3. Per Table 4, at the same extension level, DX55 may thin only half that of AA5754-H111. Thus, during deep drawing, the aluminum grade will exhibit excessive thinning well earlier than with steel.
Special Care in Testing and Simulation
5xxx-series aluminum alloys may exhibit nonhomogeneous behavior such as yield-point elongation and serrated flow, both visible in Fig. 1. During material-characterization tests, special care must be taken for determining r-value. The latest revision of ISO 10113—Determination of plastic strain ratio—explains how the width measurement should be taken for such materials.
When simulating sheet metal forming, successful results rely on accurate material cards. Lacking reliable experimental data, someone might possibly create a material card with r-values entered as 1-1-1, for rolling, transverse and diagonal directions. This may work fine with some steels, as their r-values typically are higher than 1, so the thinning behavior would be overestimated but the process design would be safe.
However, aluminum grades typically have r-values lower than 1, so assuming an r-value of 1 would underestimate the thinning. In addition, it is well known that the typical mathematical model used to describe anisotropic yield, the Hill 1948 yield criterion, does not perform well for r-values below 1. Also, recent studies in Europe show that the Vegter 2017 mechanical test for predicting advanced yield criteria may not work well with aluminum alloys. The yield surface should be selected as BBC 2005 or Barlat 1989.
Lastly, for forming-limit-curve estimation, the only known method for aluminum alloys is the Arcelor V9 aluminum macro, available in some commercial software. Selection of Keeler or Abspoel macros is not recommended for aluminum.
New Nomenclature
Aluminum alloys still are most commonly designated using a four-digit numbering system, sometimes followed by a letter (e.g., 6110A). Temper designations are then added, consisting of a letter and optional numbers (e.g., F, H39, T6). However, in the 2000s we saw some automotive aluminum alloys become named based on their initial yield strength—Ac120 and Ac170 for example.
More recently, aluminum suppliers and automotive OEMs have introduced new naming conventions through proprietary or collaborative standards. Examples include Al5-STD, Al5-IIC, Al6-OUT, Al6-DR and Al7-UHS. In these designations, the number represents the alloy family (5xxx, 6xxx or 7xxx), while the letter codes may correspond to:
- STD–Standard
- IIC–Improved intergranular corrosion
- OUT–Outer panel
- DR–Dent-resistant
- UHS–Ultra-high strength
It is essential to specify which standard these names refer to, as interpretations may vary between sources. Additionally, depending on the standard, the temper designation still must be included. For example, Al5-IIC-H111 represents a specific alloy and condition within this new naming framework. MF
Industry-Related Terms: Alloys,
Drawing,
Form,
Forming,
Model,
Revision,
Springback,
Surface,
Temper Designation,
Tensile Strength,
Wrought,
Forming,
Deep Drawing,
FormingView Glossary of Metalforming Terms Technologies: Materials